SKILL.md into your agent's skills directory. See the install & use guide for per-agent instructions.
curl -o SKILL.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nonprofit-skills/nonprofit-skills/main/nonprofit-skills-library/skills/governance-compliance/nonprofit-risk-management/SKILL.md
Nonprofit Risk Management
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill for organization-wide risk identification, insurance, crisis response, and safeguarding policy. Trigger tasks include: "do a risk assessment for our organization," "review our insurance policy — are we covered for X," "we run programs for kids — what safeguarding policy do we need," "write a crisis communications plan for [an incident]," "design an incident reporting procedure," "what background-check protocol should volunteers working with minors go through," or "build a business continuity plan in case we lose our building/ED/key system."
Boundary: this skill covers physical, reputational, program-safety, and insurable risk. Internal
financial controls and fraud/segregation-of-duties design are nonprofit-financial-controls. Donor
data privacy, PCI compliance, and data-sharing policy specifically are nonprofit-data-privacy.
Volunteer recruitment and general onboarding mechanics are nonprofit-volunteer-management (this
skill's screening protocols feed into, but don't replace, that onboarding process).
Core Framework: Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) for Nonprofits
Move beyond ad hoc "what could go wrong" brainstorming to a structured risk register:
- Identify risks across categories: programmatic (harm to a client/beneficiary), financial
(fraud, loss of major funding), operational (loss of facility, key-person dependency), reputational
(media/PR crisis, social media incident), compliance/legal (regulatory violation, employment
claim), and governance (board dysfunction, ED departure without succession plan — see
nonprofit-succession-planning). - Assess each identified risk on two axes: likelihood (rare/unlikely/possible/likely/almost certain) and impact (insignificant/minor/moderate/major/catastrophic) — plot on a 5x5 heat map to prioritize, rather than treating every risk as equally urgent.
- Mitigate each high-priority risk with a named strategy: avoid (stop the activity), reduce (add controls/training), transfer (insurance, contractual indemnification/waivers), or accept (document the decision to retain the risk, usually for low-impact/low-likelihood items only).
- Assign ownership and review cadence — a risk register with no named owner per risk and no review schedule (recommended: at least annually, presented to the board or a risk/audit committee) becomes a static document nobody revisits until after an incident occurs.
- Standard deliverable: a risk register (spreadsheet or table) with columns for risk description, category, likelihood, impact, mitigation strategy, owner, status, and last-reviewed date.
Insurance Coverage Review
Map coverage against the risk register rather than reviewing policies in isolation. Core policy types and what each actually covers:
- General Liability (GL) — third-party bodily injury/property damage claims (e.g., a visitor slips at an event); baseline coverage almost every nonprofit needs, but does not cover professional errors or abuse claims — those need separate riders/policies below.
- Directors & Officers (D&O) — covers board/officer decisions and governance-related claims
(e.g., wrongful termination allegations against the ED, a disgruntled former board member suing
over a removal); pairs with the bylaws indemnification clause (
nonprofit-bylaws-policy) — indemnification without D&O insurance behind it is a hollow protection if the organization lacks funds to actually cover a claim. - Professional Liability / Errors & Omissions (E&O) — covers claims arising from the professional service itself (e.g., a counseling nonprofit's clinical advice, a legal-aid org's representation) — essential for any organization providing licensed or quasi-professional services, not covered by GL.
- Abuse/Molestation Coverage — a distinct rider or policy, NOT automatically included in GL or even umbrella policies — mandatory to explicitly confirm for any organization serving minors, elderly, or vulnerable adults (youth programs, camps, mentoring, disability services, some faith-based programs); a shockingly common gap is assuming GL covers this when the policy explicitly excludes it.
- Property insurance — building, equipment, and contents; confirm whether the policy covers
replacement cost vs. actual cash value (depreciated), and whether it's adequate for owned vs.
leased space (see
nonprofit-vendor-facilitiesfor the lease-side obligations). - Cyber liability — data breach response costs, ransomware, and business interruption from a
cyber incident; increasingly necessary given donor/client PII exposure (coordinate with
nonprofit-data-privacyon the underlying data practices this insures against). - Umbrella/excess liability — extends limits above the underlying GL/auto/D&O policies for catastrophic claims; cost-effective way to raise total coverage without buying up every underlying policy's limit individually.
- Volunteer accident/workers' comp considerations — confirm whether volunteers are covered under GL, a separate volunteer accident policy, or excluded entirely; paid staff need workers' compensation per state law regardless of nonprofit status.
Insurance Review Checklist
- Pull the full list of current policies and their declarations pages (coverage limits, deductibles, exclusions).
- Cross-walk against the risk register — for every "transfer via insurance" mitigation, confirm an actual policy covers it (not assumed).
- Check named-insured accuracy — related entities (a supporting 501(c)(4), a fiscal-sponsored
project) may not be automatically covered under the parent's policy unless specifically named
(see
nonprofit-c3-c4-structureandnonprofit-mergers-fiscal-sponsorship). - Review exclusions closely, especially abuse/molestation carve-outs and any communicable-disease or pandemic exclusions added since 2020.
- Benchmark limits against peer organizations of similar size/activity via a broker who specializes in nonprofit coverage, not a generalist commercial broker.
- Set an annual renewal review on the calendar, not just an auto-renewal default.
Safeguarding and Incident Policy (Programs Serving Minors/Vulnerable Adults)
- Screening protocol: criminal background checks (and, where relevant, sex-offender registry checks and reference checks) for every staff member and volunteer with unsupervised access to minors/vulnerable adults, re-run on a periodic cycle (commonly every 1-3 years), not just at hire.
- Two-adult rule / no-unsupervised-contact policy: require two screened adults present for activities with minors, and prohibit one-on-one unsupervised contact (including electronic/social media contact) as a structural control, not a trust-based one.
- Mandatory reporting training: train all staff/volunteers on state mandatory-reporter obligations for suspected abuse/neglect, including exact reporting channel and timeline (varies by state — confirm current law rather than assuming a uniform national rule).
- Incident reporting procedure: a written, simple process any staff/volunteer/participant can use
to report a concern, naming who receives reports (should include a channel outside the normal
chain of command, mirroring the whistleblower channel design in
nonprofit-bylaws-policy), the required response timeline, and escalation to law enforcement/child protective services where legally required. - Board/ED notification protocol: define which incident severities require immediate ED notification vs. board notification vs. legal counsel engagement — a common failure mode is an incident that should have reached the board getting stuck at the program-manager level.
Crisis Response and Business Continuity
- Crisis response plan structure: activation trigger (what counts as a crisis), a named crisis team with backup designees (not just one person who might be unreachable), a communications protocol (internal staff/board notification before external statements), designated spokesperson, and a decision log kept during the event.
- Draft holding statements in advance for foreseeable scenarios (safety incident, financial
scandal, natural disaster affecting facility/clients) so the first public response doesn't have to
be composed from scratch under pressure — coordinate with
nonprofit-media-relationsfor execution mechanics once a statement is needed. - Business continuity/disaster recovery plan: identify single points of failure (one person who
knows the payroll system, one physical location for all records) and mitigate — offsite/cloud
backup of critical records, a documented emergency operating procedure if the primary facility is
unusable, and a named line of authority succession if the ED is suddenly unavailable (full
leadership pipeline planning is
nonprofit-succession-planning; this skill covers the emergency- authority stopgap specifically). - Test the plan — a tabletop exercise annually with the crisis team walking through a realistic scenario surfaces gaps a written plan alone won't reveal.
Standard Deliverables
- Risk register (categorized, scored, mitigation-assigned, owned)
- Insurance coverage cross-walk against the risk register with gap list
- Safeguarding policy (screening protocol, two-adult rule, mandatory reporting training plan)
- Incident reporting procedure with escalation thresholds
- Crisis response plan with holding statements
- Business continuity/disaster recovery plan
Practitioner vs. Advisor Framing
- As the ED or operations lead, start from the risk register, not the insurance policy — buying more coverage without first identifying what's actually exposed wastes budget on the wrong lines and leaves real gaps (most commonly abuse/molestation coverage) unaddressed; run the tabletop crisis exercise before an actual crisis, not after.
- As an advisor, use the insurance-coverage cross-walk as a fast, concrete diagnostic to open a broader risk conversation with a client board — a missing abuse/molestation rider or an unnamed related entity on a D&O policy are specific, credible findings that build trust for a deeper engagement, more effective than a generic "you should manage risk better" recommendation.